The DRC parliament is
presently debating proposed in the process of discussing legislation which will criminalise homosexuality. There are a number of major difference between the DRC Bill and legislation proposed in for example, Nigeria and Uganda which have proposed similar legislation. First the DRC does not presently have any laws on homosexuality and secondly this Bill includes a clause criminalising zooophilia which is directly associated with homosexuality “.
[English translation] The moral rules tell us that homosexuality (lesbianism) is a zoophilia termed moral depravity abomination, references to the Bible and other writings. Given the requirements to preserve our society of this scourge and promote destructive Congolese culture on the one hand, and to overcome the repressive system Congolese become incomplete and inadequate for the evolution and cultural mix in planetary scale on the other.
The Bill is framed in the usual language that homosexuality is “unAfrican” against ‘our’ culture, ‘threat’ to family and religious preservation. In other areas the Bill is similar in that it also aims to criminalise
any activities that directly or indirectly aim to promoting the rights LGBTI persons, therefore, in accordance with section 174h3 of the Bill, “all publications, posters, pamphlets, (or) films highlighting or likely to arouse or encourage sexual practices against nature are forbidden within the territory of the DRC (Section 174h3)” and “all associations that promote or defend sexual relations against nature are forbidden within the territory of the DRC.”
However the Bill is facing some parliamentry opposition on the basis that it will “violate individual freedoms dearly proclaimed by the Constitution and goes against the current trend of wider individual and human rights in the DRC”. In addition human rights and LGBTI within the DRC and other countries in Central and East Africa are working diligently to prevent the Bill from being passed – it is also important and in the best interest of those who would be directly affected by the legislation that local groups take the leadership in decision making and responding to the bill.
As usual religious leaders of all persuasions are at the forefront of condemning gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people but remain eerily silent on the violence of poverty, on the systematic rape of women by various militias and the Congolese armed forces, poverty and the massive levels of corruption in the DRC government. It is obvious that the proposed law like its siblings in other parts of the continent is nothing more than a political decoy for a government which is not willing to address the real needs and issues facing it’s citizens.
The proposed law is as follows:
Democratic Republic of Congo
Proposed Law Concerning Sexual Practices Against Nature
Introduced by the Honorable Bishop Ejiba Yamapia Evariste
Proposed Law Concerning Sexual Practices Against Nature
Law number ……/…… of …….. modifying and supplementing the decree of 30 January 1940 of the Congolese Penal Code and the law of 20 July 2006 on sexual violence.
Globalisation and modernisation have not only been positive forces in the lives of people of the world in general and especially in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
Indeed, we have witnessed in recent decades practices that in the name of freedom have dismantled the foundations of an African society based on family stability and the preservation of Congolese culture, ethics, ways and customs.
Indeed, it is the responsibility of public authority, in conformity with Article 40 of the Constitution, to guarantee the safety of the family against all phenomena likely to threaten its unity, its stability, and its protection.
The homosexuality that some consider as an expression of liberty and of democracy is nothing more than a threat to the family as the foundation of society and has severely attacked Congolese culture. It is nothing more nor less than a deviation of the human race towards relations against nature.
Moral rules teach us that homosexuality (lesbianism) and zoophilia constitute a moral depravity and are described as an abomination, reference to which is made in the Bible and other writings.
Having regard to the need to save our society from this descrutive scourge and to promote Congolese culture on the one hand, and to overcome a repressive Congolese system that is incomplete and ill-adapted to the evolution and cultural mix on global scale on the other hand.
The constituent, aware of his responsibilities before God and the Congolese Nation,
It is imperative to revise the Congolese Penal Code with the integration of rules concerning sexual practices against nature. This law has the value of contributing to the restoration of morals, the protection of the family, and the safeguarding of the cultural identity of the DRC.
With regard to the Penal Code and the law of 20 July 2006 on sexual violence, the changes are mainly to section III, of Title VI of CPL II, paragraph 8 of the Law on Sexual Violence relating to the offense of sexual practices against nature, never before criminalised in the Penal Code of the DRC.
The National Assembly has adopted,
The President of the Republic promulgates the law, which reads as follows:
Article 1: Paragraph 8, of section III of Title VI, of the Penal Code LII, which has been modified and supplemented by the Law of 20 July 2006, which reads:
Paragraph 8: Sexual Practices Against Nature
Article 2: Sexual practices against nature constitute zoophilia and homosexuality.
Article 174h: Anyone who, by trickery, violence, threats or any other form of coercion or artifice, forces a person to have sexual relations with an animal will be punished by 5 to 10 years in prison and a fine of 200,0000 Congolese francs.â€¨â€¨Anyone who voluntarily has sexual relations with an animal will be punished by the same penalties as listed above.
Art. 174h1: Anyone who has homosexual relations will be punished by 3 to 5 years in prison and a fine of 500,000 Congolese francs.â€¨â€¨Subject to Article 170 of the Congolese Penal Code as modified and supplemented by the Law on Sexual Violence, anyone who by constraint, trickery, violence, threats or by any other form of coercion forces a person to have homosexual relations will be punished by 5 to 20 years in prison and a fine of not less than 100,000 Congolese francs.
Art. 174h2: All associations that promote or defend sexual relations against nature are forbidden within the territory of the DRC.â€¨â€¨Anyone who creates, finances, initiates or implements an association or any structure promoting sexual relations against nature in the DRC will be punished by 6 months to one year imprisonment and a fine of 1,000,000 Congolese francs.
Art. 174h3: All publications, posters, pamphlets, (or) films highlighting or likely to arouse or encourage sexual practices against nature are forbidden within the territory of the DRC.
Article 3: All previous provisions contrary to the present law are abrogated.
Article 4: The law enters into force on the date of its promulgation.
Signed at Kinshasa, date _______